| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The recursive lock used on abort does not synchronize with a new process
creation (either by fork-like interfaces or posix_spawn ones), nor it
is reinitialized after fork().
Also, the SIGABRT unblock before raise() shows another race condition,
where a fork or posix_spawn() call by another thread, just after the
recursive lock release and before the SIGABRT signal, might create
programs with a non-expected signal mask. With the default option
(without POSIX_SPAWN_SETSIGDEF), the process can see SIG_DFL for
SIGABRT, where it should be SIG_IGN.
To fix the AS-safe, raise() does not change the process signal mask,
and an AS-safe lock is used if a SIGABRT is installed or the process
is blocked or ignored. With the signal mask change removal,
there is no need to use a recursive loc. The lock is also taken on
both _Fork() and posix_spawn(), to avoid the spawn process to see the
abort handler as SIG_DFL.
A read-write lock is used to avoid serialize _Fork and posix_spawn
execution. Both sigaction (SIGABRT) and abort() requires to lock
as writer (since both change the disposition).
The fallback is also simplified: there is no need to use a loop of
ABORT_INSTRUCTION after _exit() (if the syscall does not terminate the
process, the system is broken).
The proposed fix changes how setjmp works on a SIGABRT handler, where
glibc does not save the signal mask. So usage like the below will now
always abort.
static volatile int chk_fail_ok;
static jmp_buf chk_fail_buf;
static void
handler (int sig)
{
if (chk_fail_ok)
{
chk_fail_ok = 0;
longjmp (chk_fail_buf, 1);
}
else
_exit (127);
}
[...]
signal (SIGABRT, handler);
[....]
chk_fail_ok = 1;
if (! setjmp (chk_fail_buf))
{
// Something that can calls abort, like a failed fortify function.
chk_fail_ok = 0;
printf ("FAIL\n");
}
Such cases will need to use sigsetjmp instead.
The _dl_start_profile calls sigaction through _profil, and to avoid
pulling abort() on loader the call is replaced with __libc_sigaction.
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu and aarch64-linux-gnu.
Reviewed-by: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
|
|
The test tst-strtod-underflow covers various edge cases close to the
underflow threshold for strtod (especially cases where underflow on
architectures with after-rounding tininess detection depends on the
rounding mode). Make it use the type-generic machinery, with
corresponding test inputs for each supported floating-point format, so
that other functions in the strtod family are tested for underflow
edge cases as well.
Tested for x86_64.
|
|
There is very little test coverage of inputs to strtod-family
functions that don't contain anything that can be parsed as a number
(one test of ".y" in tst-strtod2), and none that I can see of skipping
initial whitespace. Add some tests of these things to tst-strtod2.
Tested for x86_64.
|
|
Although there are some tests in tst-strtod2 and tst-strtod3 for the
end pointer provided by strtod when it doesn't parse the whole string,
they aren't very thorough. Add tests of more such cases to
tst-strtod2.
Tested for x86_64.
|
|
Some of the strtod tests use type-generic machinery in tst-strtod.h to
test the strto* functions for all floating types, while others only
test double even when the tests are in fact meaningful for all
floating types.
Convert tst-strtod2 and tst-strtod5 to use the type-generic machinery
so they test all floating types. I haven't tried to convert them to
use newer test interfaces in other ways, just made the changes
necessary to use the type-generic machinery.
Tested for x86_64.
|
|
As reported in bug 32045, it's incorrect for strtod/nan functions to
set errno based on overflowing payload (strtod should only set errno
for overflow / underflow of its actual result, and potentially if
nothing in the string can be parsed as a number at all; nan should be
a pure function that never sets it). Save and restore errno around
the internal strtoull call and add associated test coverage.
Tested for x86_64.
|
|
Some of the strtod tests use type-generic machinery in tst-strtod.h to
test the strto* functions for all floating types, while others only
test double even when the tests are in fact meaningful for all
floating types.
Convert the tests of the internal __strtod_internal interface to cover
all floating types. I haven't tried to convert them to use newer test
interfaces in other ways, just made the changes necessary to use the
type-generic machinery. As an internal interface, there are no
aliases for different types with the same ABI (however,
__strtold_internal is defined even if long double has the same ABI as
double), so macros used by the type-generic testing code are redefined
as needed to avoid expecting such aliases to be present.
Tested for x86_64.
|
|
As reported in bug 30220, the implementation of strtod-family
functions has a bug in the following case: the input string would,
with infinite exponent range, take one more bit to represent than is
available in the normal precision of the return type; the value
represented is in the subnormal range; and there are no nonzero bits
in the value, below those that can be represented in subnormal
precision, other than the least significant bit and possibly the
0.5ulp bit. In this case, round_and_return ends up discarding the
least significant bit.
Fix by saving that bit to merge into more_bits (it can't be merged in
at the time it's computed, because more_bits mustn't include this bit
in the case of after-rounding tininess detection checking if the
result is still subnormal when rounded to normal precision, so merging
this bit into more_bits needs to take place after that check).
Tested for x86_64.
|
|
Add tests of underflow in tst-strtod-round, and thus also test for
errno being unchanged when there is neither overflow nor underflow.
The errno setting before the function call to test for being unchanged
is adjusted to set errno to 12345 instead of 0, so that any bugs where
strtod sets errno to 0 would be detected.
This doesn't add any new test inputs for tst-strtod-round, and in
particular doesn't cover the edge cases of underflow the way
tst-strtod-underflow does (none of the existing test inputs for
tst-strtod-round actually exercise cases that have underflow with
before-rounding tininess detection but not with after-rounding
tininess detection), but at least it provides some coverage (as per
the recent discussions) that ordinary non-overflowing non-underflowing
inputs to these functions do not set errno.
Tested for x86_64.
|
|
Macros will automatically use the correct types, without
having to fiddle with internal glibc macros. It's also
impossible to get the types wrong due to aliasing because
support_check_stat_fd and support_check_stat_path do not
depend on the struct stat* types.
The changes reveal some inconsistencies in tests.
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
|
|
We have no tests that errno is set to ERANGE on overflow of
strtod-family functions (we do have some tests for underflow, in
tst-strtod-underflow). Add such tests to tst-strtod-round.
Tested for x86_64.
|
|
This avoids a Hurd build failure. Fixes commit c6af8a9a3c
("stdlib: Allow concurrent quick_exit (BZ 31997)").
|
|
As for exit, also allows concurrent quick_exit to avoid race
conditions when it is called concurrently. Since it uses the same
internal function as exit, the __exit_lock lock is moved to
__run_exit_handlers. It also solved a potential concurrent when
calling exit and quick_exit concurrently.
The test case 'expected' is expanded to a value larger than the
minimum required by C/POSIX (32 entries) so at_quick_exit() will
require libc to allocate a new block. This makes the test mre likely to
trigger concurrent issues (through free() at __run_exit_handlers)
if quick_exit() interacts with the at_quick_exit list concurrently.
This is also the latest interpretation of the Austin Ticket [1].
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu.
[1] https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1845
Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
|
|
Rename the identifier sz to __sz everywhere.
Fixes: a643f60c53 ("Make sure that the fortified function conditionals are constant")
|
|
This avoids a Hurd build failure. Fixes commit f6ba993e0cda0ca
("stdlib: Allow concurrent exit (BZ 31997)").
|
|
This helps HotColdSplitting in GCC/LLVM.
Thought about doing `exit` as well since its only called once per
process, but since its easy to imagine a hot path leading into
`exit(0)`, its less clear if its profitable.
Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
|
|
Even if C/POSIX standard states that exit is not formally thread-unsafe,
calling it more than once is UB. The glibc already supports
it for the single-thread, and both elf/nodelete2.c and tst-rseq-disable.c
call exit from a DSO destructor (which is called by _dl_fini, registered
at program startup with __cxa_atexit).
However, there are still race issues when it is called more than once
concurrently by multiple threads. A recent Rust PR triggered this
issue [1], which resulted in an Austin Group ask for clarification [2].
Besides it, there is a discussion to make concurrent calling not UB [3],
wtih a defined semantic where any remaining callers block until the first
call to exit has finished (reentrant calls, leaving through longjmp, and
exceptions are still undefined).
For glibc, at least reentrant calls are required to be supported to avoid
changing the current behaviour. This requires locking using a recursive
lock, where any exit called by atexit() handlers resumes at the point of
the current handler (thus avoiding calling the current handle multiple
times).
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu and aarch64-linux-gnu.
[1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126600
[2] https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1845
[3] https://www.openwall.com/lists/libc-coord/2024/07/24/4
Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
Reviewed-By: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
|
|
The __getrandom_nocancel used by __arc4random_buf uses
INLINE_SYSCALL_CALL (which returns -1/errno) and the loop checks for
the return value instead of errno to fallback to /dev/urandom.
The malloc code now uses __getrandom_nocancel_nostatus, which uses
INTERNAL_SYSCALL_CALL, so there is no need to use the variant that does
not set errno (BZ#29624).
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Reviewed-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
|
|
The log incorrectly prints, setcontext failed. Update this to indicate
that actually swapcontext failed.
Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
|
|
It improve fortify checks for realpath, ptsname_r, wctomb, mbstowcs,
and wcstombs. The runtime and compile checks have similar coverage as
with GCC.
Checked on aarch64, armhf, x86_64, and i686.
Tested-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
|
|
Resolves: BZ # 29845
|
|
Complete the internal renaming from "C2X" and related names in GCC by
renaming *-c2x and *-gnu2x tests to *-c23 and *-gnu23.
Tested for x86_64, and with build-many-glibcs.py for powerpc64le.
|
|
WG14 decided to use the name C23 as the informal name of the next
revision of the C standard (notwithstanding the publication date in
2024). Update references to C2X in glibc to use the C23 name.
This is intended to update everything *except* where it involves
renaming files (the changes involving renaming tests are intended to
be done separately). In the case of the _ISOC2X_SOURCE feature test
macro - the only user-visible interface involved - support for that
macro is kept for backwards compatibility, while adding
_ISOC23_SOURCE.
Tested for x86_64.
|
|
The following patch uses the GCC 14 __builtin_stdc_* builtins in stdbit.h
for the type-generic macros, so that when compiled with GCC 14 or later,
it supports not just 8/16/32/64-bit unsigned integers, but also 128-bit
(if target supports them) and unsigned _BitInt (any supported precision).
And so that the macros don't expand arguments multiple times and can be
evaluated in constant expressions.
The new testcase is gcc's gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-stdc-bit-1.c
adjusted to test stdbit.h and the type-generic macros in there instead
of the builtins and adjusted to use glibc test framework rather than
gcc style tests with __builtin_abort ().
Signed-off-by: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Myers <josmyers@redhat.com>
|
|
In qsort_r we allocate a buffer sized QSORT_STACK_SIZE (1024) on stack
and we intend to use it if all elements can fit into it. But there is a
typo:
if (total_size < sizeof buf)
buf = tmp;
else
/* allocate a buffer on heap and use it ... */
Here "buf" is a pointer, thus sizeof buf is just 4 or 8, instead of
1024. There is also a minor issue that we should use "<=" instead of
"<".
This bug is detected debugging some strange heap corruption running the
Ruby-3.3.0 test suite (on an experimental Linux From Scratch build using
Binutils-2.41.90 and Glibc trunk, and also Fedora Rawhide [1]). It
seems Ruby is doing some wild "optimization" by jumping into somewhere
in qsort_r instead of calling it normally, resulting in a double free of
buf if we allocate it on heap. The issue can be reproduced
deterministically with:
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libc_malloc_debug.so MALLOC_CHECK_=3 \
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./ruby test/runner.rb test/ruby/test_enum.rb
in Ruby-3.3.0 tree after building it. This change would hide the issue
for Ruby, but Ruby is likely still buggy (if using this "optimization"
sorting larger arrays).
[1]:https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/9729/111889729/build.log
Signed-off-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
|
|
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu.
|
|
Adjust the testing approach to start from scenarios with only 2
elements, as insertion sort no longer handles such cases.
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
|
|
When malloc fails to allocate a buffer and falls back to heapsort, the
current heapsort implementation does not perform sorting when there are
exactly two elements. Heapsort is now skipped only when there is
exactly one element.
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
|
|
The mergesort removal from qsort implementation (commit 03bf8357e8)
had the side-effect of making sorting nonstable. Although neither
POSIX nor C standard specify that qsort should be stable, it seems
that it has become an instance of Hyrum's law where multiple programs
expect it.
Also, the resulting introsort implementation is not faster than
the previous mergesort (which makes the change even less appealing).
This patch restores the previous mergesort implementation, with the
exception of machinery that checks the resulting allocation against
the _SC_PHYS_PAGES (it only adds complexity and the heuristic not
always make sense depending on the system configuration and load).
The alloca usage was replaced with a fixed-size buffer.
For the fallback mechanism, the implementation uses heapsort. It is
simpler than quicksort, and it does not suffer from adversarial
inputs. With memory overcommit, it should be rarely triggered.
The drawback is mergesort requires O(n) extra space, and since it is
allocated with malloc the function is AS-signal-unsafe. It should be
feasible to change it to use mmap, although I am not sure how urgent
it is. The heapsort is also nonstable, so programs that require a
stable sort would still be subject to this latent issue.
The tst-qsort5 is removed since it will not create quicksort adversarial
inputs with the current qsort_r implementation.
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu and aarch64-linux-gnu.
Reviewed-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
|
|
With clang 14 and also with main the tst-stdbit-Wconversion
issues the warnings:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:701:40: error: implicit conversion loses integer
precision: 'int' to 'uint16_t' (aka 'unsigned short')
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-int-conversion]
return __x == 0 ? 0 : ((uint16_t) 1) << (__bw16_inline (__x) - 1);
~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:707:39: error: implicit conversion loses integer
precision: 'int' to 'uint8_t' (aka 'unsigned char')
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-int-conversion]
return __x == 0 ? 0 : ((uint8_t) 1) << (__bw8_inline (__x) - 1);
~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:751:40: error: implicit conversion loses integer
precision: 'int' to 'uint16_t' (aka 'unsigned short')
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-int-conversion]
return __x <= 1 ? 1 : ((uint16_t) 2) << (__bw16_inline (__x - 1) - 1);
~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:757:39: error: implicit conversion loses integer
precision: 'int' to 'uint8_t' (aka 'unsigned char')
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-int-conversion]
return __x <= 1 ? 1 : ((uint8_t) 2) << (__bw8_inline (__x - 1) - 1);
~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tst-stdbit-Wconversion.c:45:31: error: implicit conversion loses integer
precision: 'unsigned short' to 'uint8_t' (aka 'unsigned char')
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-int-conversion]
(void) stdc_trailing_zeros (us);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:164:30: note: expanded from macro
'stdc_trailing_zeros'
: stdc_trailing_zeros_uc (x))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:191:52: note: expanded from macro
'stdc_trailing_zeros_uc'
# define stdc_trailing_zeros_uc(x) (__ctz8_inline (x))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
tst-stdbit-Wconversion.c:46:31: error: implicit conversion loses integer
precision: 'unsigned int' to 'uint16_t' (aka 'unsigned short')
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-int-conversion]
(void) stdc_trailing_zeros (ui);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:163:48: note: expanded from macro
'stdc_trailing_zeros'
: sizeof (x) == 2 ? stdc_trailing_zeros_us (x) \
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:192:53: note: expanded from macro
'stdc_trailing_zeros_us'
# define stdc_trailing_zeros_us(x) (__ctz16_inline (x))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
tst-stdbit-Wconversion.c:46:31: error: implicit conversion loses integer
precision: 'unsigned int' to 'uint8_t' (aka 'unsigned char')
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-int-conversion]
(void) stdc_trailing_zeros (ui);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:164:30: note: expanded from macro
'stdc_trailing_zeros'
: stdc_trailing_zeros_uc (x))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:191:52: note: expanded from macro
'stdc_trailing_zeros_uc'
# define stdc_trailing_zeros_uc(x) (__ctz8_inline (x))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
tst-stdbit-Wconversion.c:47:31: error: implicit conversion loses integer
precision: 'unsigned long' to 'uint16_t' (aka 'unsigned short')
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-int-conversion]
(void) stdc_trailing_zeros (ul);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:163:48: note: expanded from macro
'stdc_trailing_zeros'
: sizeof (x) == 2 ? stdc_trailing_zeros_us (x) \
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:192:53: note: expanded from macro
'stdc_trailing_zeros_us'
# define stdc_trailing_zeros_us(x) (__ctz16_inline (x))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
[...]
It seems to boiler down to __builtin_clz not having a variant for 8 or
16 bits. Fix it by explicit casting to the expected types. Although
not strickly required for older gcc, using the same __pacify macro
simpify the required code.
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu.
|
|
With gcc 6.5.0, 7.5.0, 8.5.0, and 9.5.0 the tst-stdbit-Wconversion
issues the warnings:
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__clo16_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:128:26: error: conversion to ‘uint16_t {aka short
unsigned int}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __clz16_inline (~__x);
^
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__clo8_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:134:25: error: conversion to ‘uint8_t {aka unsigned
char}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __clz8_inline (~__x);
^
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__cto16_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:232:26: error: conversion to ‘uint16_t {aka short
unsigned int}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __ctz16_inline (~__x);
^
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__cto8_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:238:25: error: conversion to ‘uint8_t {aka unsigned
char}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __ctz8_inline (~__x);
^
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__bf16_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:701:23: error: conversion to ‘uint16_t {aka short
unsigned int}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __x == 0 ? 0 : ((uint16_t) 1) << (__bw16_inline (__x) - 1);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__bf8_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:707:23: error: conversion to ‘uint8_t {aka unsigned
char}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __x == 0 ? 0 : ((uint8_t) 1) << (__bw8_inline (__x) - 1);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__bc16_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:751:59: error: conversion to ‘uint16_t {aka short
unsigned int}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __x <= 1 ? 1 : ((uint16_t) 2) << (__bw16_inline (__x - 1) -
1);
^~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:751:23: error: conversion to ‘uint16_t {aka short
unsigned int}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __x <= 1 ? 1 : ((uint16_t) 2) << (__bw16_inline (__x - 1) -
1);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__bc8_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:757:57: error: conversion to ‘uint8_t {aka unsigned
char}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __x <= 1 ? 1 : ((uint8_t) 2) << (__bw8_inline (__x - 1) - 1);
^~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:757:23: error: conversion to ‘uint8_t {aka unsigned
char}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __x <= 1 ? 1 : ((uint8_t) 2) << (__bw8_inline (__x - 1) - 1);
It seems to boiler down to __builtin_clz not having a variant for 8 or
16 bits. Fix it by explicit casting to the expected types.
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu with gcc 9.5.0.
|
|
C23 adds a header <stdbit.h> with various functions and type-generic
macros for bit-manipulation of unsigned integers (plus macro defines
related to endianness). Implement this header for glibc.
The functions have both inline definitions in the header (referenced
by macros defined in the header) and copies with external linkage in
the library (which are implemented in terms of those macros to avoid
duplication). They are documented in the glibc manual. Tests, as
well as verifying results for various inputs (of both the macros and
the out-of-line functions), verify the types of those results (which
showed up a bug in an earlier version with the type-generic macro
stdc_has_single_bit wrongly returning a promoted type), that the
macros can be used at top level in a source file (so don't use ({})),
that they evaluate their arguments exactly once, and that the macros
for the type-specific functions have the expected implicit conversions
to the relevant argument type.
Jakub previously referred to -Wconversion warnings in type-generic
macros, so I've included a test with -Wconversion (but the only
warnings I saw and fixed from that test were actually in inline
functions in the <stdbit.h> header - not anything coming from use of
the type-generic macros themselves).
This implementation of the type-generic macros does not handle
unsigned __int128, or unsigned _BitInt types with a width other than
that of a standard integer type (and C23 doesn't require the header to
handle such types either). Support for those types, using the new
type-generic built-in functions Jakub's added for GCC 14, can
reasonably be added in a followup (along of course with associated
tests).
This implementation doesn't do anything special to handle C++, or have
any tests of functionality in C++ beyond the existing tests that all
headers can be compiled in C++ code; it's not clear exactly what form
this header should take in C++, but probably not one using macros.
DIS ballot comment AT-107 asks for the word "count" to be added to the
names of the stdc_leading_zeros, stdc_leading_ones,
stdc_trailing_zeros and stdc_trailing_ones functions and macros. I
don't think it's likely to be accepted (accepting any technical
comments would mean having an FDIS ballot), but if it is accepted at
the WG14 meeting (22-26 January in Strasbourg, starting with DIS
ballot comment handling) then there would still be time to update
glibc for the renaming before the 2.39 release.
The new functions and header are placed in the stdlib/ directory in
glibc, rather than creating a new toplevel stdbit/ or putting them in
string/ alongside ffs.
Tested for x86_64 and x86.
|
|
Verify that setjmp and longjmp work correctly between user contexts.
Arrange stacks for uctx_func1 and uctx_func2 so that ____longjmp_chk
works when setjmp and longjmp are called from different user contexts.
Reviewed-by: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
|
