aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorXe Iaso <me@xeiaso.net>2024-01-17 21:47:08 -0500
committerXe Iaso <me@xeiaso.net>2024-01-17 21:47:08 -0500
commit2a5c27109316dc296e5997634bb878d82e07d868 (patch)
tree705aa2747c21820e0988072196c1cf3d86875e49
parentf84bfbd2155a11163025bbe6b8b29733c0020ae8 (diff)
downloadxesite-2a5c27109316dc296e5997634bb878d82e07d868.tar.xz
xesite-2a5c27109316dc296e5997634bb878d82e07d868.zip
2024
Signed-off-by: Xe Iaso <me@xeiaso.net>
-rw-r--r--lume/src/talks/2024/prepare-unforeseen-consequences.mdx3
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/lume/src/talks/2024/prepare-unforeseen-consequences.mdx b/lume/src/talks/2024/prepare-unforeseen-consequences.mdx
index cdf1374..043af81 100644
--- a/lume/src/talks/2024/prepare-unforeseen-consequences.mdx
+++ b/lume/src/talks/2024/prepare-unforeseen-consequences.mdx
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
title: "AI: the not-so-good parts"
-date: 2025-01-16
+date: 2024-01-16
tags:
- ai
- ethics
@@ -636,7 +636,6 @@ AI in place for moving forward. So what kind of system do you think is
more practical for that?
</BlockQuote>
-
So I think one of the more ideal outcomes would be if people that
whose work is in the training set of ChatGPT end up getting royalties
from OpenAI for their data being used to make unimaginable amounts of